Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women

Citation
Dr. Bland et al., Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women, AM J OBST G, 181(6), 1999, pp. 1324-1327
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029378 → ACNP
Volume
181
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1324 - 1327
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(199912)181:6<1324:UOTPOP>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to apply the standardized Pelvic Orga n Prolapse staging system to perimenopausal women to obtain normative data and to determine any effects of risk factors for incontinence and prolapse on Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system scores. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred forty-one women aged 45 to 55 years who were seen for perimenopausal care were evaluated in the dorsal lithotomy position fo r pelvic prolapse at enrollment and again at 12 months. Prolapse was scored according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system, as approved by the International Continence Society. All subjects completed questionnaires to obtain demographic data, reproductive history, and gynecologic history. Dat a were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney rank sum test and with 1-way analysi s of variance on ranks. RESULTS: The subjects had a mean parity of 2.2 and a mean weight of 72.4 kg . Hysterectomy had been performed in 28% of the women. Urinary incontinence was reported by 66% of the women at enrollment. Mean prolapse scares that described the position of the cervix, the position of the posterior fornix, and the total vaginal length were significantly changed by the 1-year foll ow-up, with scores reflecting increased prolapse. The mean score at point B a, which represents the proximal portion of the anterior vaginal wall, was significantly lower, consistent with decreased prolapse at this site. Histo ry of smoking;prior hysterectomy, weight, parity, and incontinence at enrol lment did not significantly correlate with any of the 9 measured prolapse p oints. CONCLUSIONS: Normative data for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons were measured in a group of perimenopausal women. Apparent increases in prolapse at points C, D, and tvl may reflect changes in vaginal size rather an increase in uterine or vaginal vault prol apse. This variability may confound the use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse st aging system in longitudinal studies involving perimenopausal women.