A randomized, controlled trial of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) versus penile nerve block for pain relief during circumcision
Cr. Howard et al., A randomized, controlled trial of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) versus penile nerve block for pain relief during circumcision, AM J OBST G, 181(6), 1999, pp. 1506-1511
OBJECTIVE: We set out to compare a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cre
am (lidocaine and prilocaine) to dorsal penile nerve block with lidocaine f
or anesthesia during circumcision.
STUDY DESIGN: In a double-blind study, term newborns were randomized to loc
al anesthetic cream and sodium chloride solution dorsal penile nerve block
(n = 31) or to placebo cream and lidocaine dorsal penile nerve block (n = 2
9). Pain was assessed by determination of heart rate, respiratory rate, and
behavioral distress scoring. Group differences were evaluated with repeat-
measures analyses of variance.
RESULTS: Distress scores and heart rates were significantly higher in the e
utectic mixture group than in the lidocaine group. Respiratory rates were h
igher in the eutectic mixture group but did not reach statistical significa
nce.
CONCLUSIONS: Distress scores and heart rates were significantly higher in i
nfants treated with the anesthetic mixture than in infants treated with lid
ocaine. Dorsal penile nerve block with lidocaine is a more efficacious mean
s of providing anesthesia for neonatal circumcision than the mixture of loc
al anesthetics.