A randomized, controlled trial of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) versus penile nerve block for pain relief during circumcision

Citation
Cr. Howard et al., A randomized, controlled trial of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) versus penile nerve block for pain relief during circumcision, AM J OBST G, 181(6), 1999, pp. 1506-1511
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029378 → ACNP
Volume
181
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1506 - 1511
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(199912)181:6<1506:ARCTOA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We set out to compare a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cre am (lidocaine and prilocaine) to dorsal penile nerve block with lidocaine f or anesthesia during circumcision. STUDY DESIGN: In a double-blind study, term newborns were randomized to loc al anesthetic cream and sodium chloride solution dorsal penile nerve block (n = 31) or to placebo cream and lidocaine dorsal penile nerve block (n = 2 9). Pain was assessed by determination of heart rate, respiratory rate, and behavioral distress scoring. Group differences were evaluated with repeat- measures analyses of variance. RESULTS: Distress scores and heart rates were significantly higher in the e utectic mixture group than in the lidocaine group. Respiratory rates were h igher in the eutectic mixture group but did not reach statistical significa nce. CONCLUSIONS: Distress scores and heart rates were significantly higher in i nfants treated with the anesthetic mixture than in infants treated with lid ocaine. Dorsal penile nerve block with lidocaine is a more efficacious mean s of providing anesthesia for neonatal circumcision than the mixture of loc al anesthetics.