The conventional wisdom about negative political advertisement holds that n
o one likes them, but they work, that is, they have the consequences their
sponsors intend. Moreover, many analysts have expressed concern over the de
trimental effects of such negativism on the American political system. We e
xamine the accuracy of the conventional wisdom and the legitimacy of the fe
ars about the consequences for the political system via meta-analysis, a sy
stematic, quantitative review of the literature. The data do not support ei
ther contention. Negative political ads appear to be no more effective than
positive ads and do not seem to have especially detrimental effects on the
political system. Eleven subsidiary hypotheses about particular circumstan
ces in which significant effects are likely to be found are tested and reje
cted. Discussion focuses on why negative political advertisements have beco
me so popular in practice when there is so little evidence that they work e
specially well.