P. Valenstein et F. Meier, Outpatient order accuracy - A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of requisition order entry accuracy in 660 institutions, ARCH PATH L, 123(12), 1999, pp. 1145-1150
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Context.--Laboratory test order entry errors potentially delay diagnosis, c
onsume resources, and cause patient inconvenience.
Objective.--To evaluate the frequency and causes of computer order entry er
rors in outpatients.
Design.--Cross-sectional survey and prospective sample of errors. Participa
nts answered questions about their test order entry policies and practices.
They then examined a sample of outpatient requisitions and compared inform
ation on the requisition with information entered into the laboratory compu
ter system. Order entry errors were divided into 4 types: tests ordered on
the requisition, but not in the computer; tests performed but not ordered o
n the requisition; physician name discrepancies; and test priority errors.
Participants.--Six hundred sixty laboratories enrolled in the college of Am
erican Pathologists Q-Probes program.
Main Outcome Measure.--Overall order entry error rate.
Results.--A total of 5514 (4.8%) of 114 934 outpatient requisitions were as
sociated with at least 1 order entry error. The median participant reported
1 or more order errors on 6.0% of requisitions; 10% of institutions report
ed errors with at least 18% of requisitions. Of the 4 specific error types,
physician name discrepancies had the highest error rate, and test priority
errors the lowest error rate. Four institutional factors were significantl
y associated with higher overall error rates: orders verbally communicated
to the laboratory; no policy requiring laboratory staff to compare a printo
ut or display of ordered tests with the laboratory requisitions to confirm
that orders had been entered correctly; failure to monitor the accuracy of
outpatient order entry on a regular basis; and a higher percentage of occup
ied beds (ie, a busier hospital).
Conclusions.--Computer order entry errors are common, involving 5% of outpa
tient requisitions. Laboratories may be able to decrease error rates by reg
ularly monitoring the accuracy of order entry, substituting written and fac
simile orders for verbal orders, and instituting a policy in which orders e
ntered into computer systems are routinely rechecked against orders on requ
isitions.