We present a quantitative analysis of the star formation history (SFH) of t
he Local Group dSph galaxy Leo I, from the information in its Hubble Space
Telescope [(V-I),I] color-magnitude diagram (CMD). It reaches the level of
the oldest main-sequence turnoffs, and this allows us to retrieve the SFH i
n considerable detail. The method we use is based on comparing, via synthet
ic CMDs, the expected distribution of stars in the CMD for different evolut
ionary scenarios with the observed distribution. We consider the SFH to be
composed by the SFR(t), the chemical enrichment law Z(t), the initial mass
function (IMF), and a function beta(f, q) controlling the fraction f and ma
ss ratio distribution a of binary stars. We analyze a set of similar or equ
al to 50 combinations of four Z(t), three IMFs, and more than four beta(f;
a). For each of them, the best SFR(t) is searched for among similar or equa
l to 6 x 10(7) models. The comparison between the observed CMD and the mode
l CMDs is done through chi(v)(2) minimization of the differences in the num
ber of stars in a set of regions of the CMD, chosen to sample stars of diff
erent ages or in specific stellar evolutionary phases. We empirically deter
mine the range of chi(v)(2) values that indicate acceptable models for our
set of data using tests with models with known SFHs. Our solution for the S
FH of Leo I defines a minimum of chi(v)(2) in a well-defined position of th
e parameter space, and the derived SFR(t) is robust, in the sense that its
main characteristics are unchanged for different combinations of the remain
ing parameters. However, only a narrow range of assumptions for Z(t), IMF,
and beta(f,q) result in a good agreement between the data and the models, n
amely, Z = 0.0004, a IMF Kroupa et al. or slightly steeper, and a relativel
y large fraction of binary stars, with f = 0.3-0.6, q > 0.6, and an approxi
mately flat IMF for the secondaries, or particular combinations of these pa
rameters that would produce a like fraction of similar mass binaries. Most
star formation activity (70% to 80%) occurred between 7 and 1 Gyr ago. At I
Gyr ago, it abruptly dropped to a negligible value, but seems to have been
active until at least similar or equal to 300 million years ago. Our resul
ts do not unambiguously answer the question of whether Leo I began forming
stars around 15 Gyr ago, but it appears that the amount of this star format
ion, if it existed at all, would be small.