K. Jarnagin et al., Identification of surface residues of the monocyte chemotactic protein 1 that affect signaling through the receptor CCR2, BIOCHEM, 38(49), 1999, pp. 16167-16177
The CC chemokine, monocyte chemotactic protein, 1 (MCP-1) functions as a ma
jor chemoattractant for T-cells and monocytes by interacting with the seven
-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor CCR2, To identify which residues
of MCP-1 contribute to signaling though CCR2, we mutated all the surface-ex
posed residues to alanine and other amino acids and made some selective lar
ge changes at the amino terminus. We then characterized the impact of these
mutations on three postreceptor pathways involving inhibition of cAMP synt
hesis, stimulation of cytosolic calcium influx, and chemotaxis. The results
highlight several important features of the signaling process and the con-
elation between binding and signaling: The amino terminus of MCP-1 is essen
tial as truncation of residues 2-8 ([1+9-76]hMCP-1) results in a protein th
at cannot stimulate chemotaxis, However, the exact peptide sequence may be
unimportant as individual alanine mutations or simultaneous replacement of
residues 3-6 with alanine had little effect. Y13 is also important and must
be a large nonpolar residue for chemotaxis to occur, Interestingly, both Y
13 and [1+9-76]hMCP-1 are high-affinity binders and thus affinity of these
mutants is not correlated with ability to promote chemotaxis, For the other
surface residues there is a strong correlation between binding affinity an
d agonist potency in-all three signaling pathways. Perhaps the most interes
ting observation is that although Y13A and [1+9-76]hMCP are antagonists of
chemotaxis, they are agonists of pathways involving inhibition of cAMP synt
hesis and, in the case of Y13A, calcium influx. These results demonstrate t
hat these two well-known signaling events are not sufficient to drive chemo
taxis, Furthermore, it suggests that specific molecular features of MCP-1 i
nduce different conformations in CCR2 that are coupled to separate postrece
ptor pathways. Therefore, by judicious design of antagonists, it should be
possible to trap CCR2 in conformational states that are unable to stimulate
all of the pathways required for chemotaxis.