Theoretical conceptualizations of the structure/agency relationship have be
en central to die development of the discipline, yet tend to exhibit two ma
jor limitations. First, they share a relatively disembodied view of the age
nt which overemphasizes cognition and marginalizes the significance of the
emotional dimensions of interaction for human action and social structure.
Second, most have difficulty maintaining the causal significance of both th
e 'people' and the 'parts' of the social system and are, therefore, unable
to examine adequately their interplay. This paper suggests these problems a
re related, and examines the contribution recent formulations of the 'inter
action order' can make toward overcoming the difficulties characteristic of
this key sociological debate. The 'interaction order' identifies the embod
ied dimensions of interaction as consequential for, yet irreducible to, str
uctures and agents, enables us to investigate the 'loose coupling' of inter
action to individuals and social systems, but is underdeveloped in importan
t respects. This paper addresses these limitations. It also highlights the
utility for the structure/agency debate of identifying a sector of embodied
interactions concerned with the maintenance of social selves, and suggests
how this somatic sector of social life might be developed analytically.