N. Bodyak et B. Slotnick, Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: Odor detection, discrimination and odor memory, CHEM SENSE, 24(6), 1999, pp. 637-645
Mice were trained on a variety of odor detection and discrimination lash in
100- or 200-trial sessions using a go, no-go discrete trials operant condi
tioning procedure. Odors, presented for 1 s on each trial, were generated b
y an air dilution olfactometer (for threshold tests) and an easily construc
ted eight-channel liquid dilution unit (for two- and multiple-odor discrimi
nation tasks). Mice rapidly acquired the operant task and demonstrated exce
llent stimulus control by odor vapors. Their absolute detection threshold f
or ethyl acetate was similar to that obtained with rats using similar metho
ds. They readily acquired four separate two-odor discrimination tasks and c
ontinued to perform well when all eight odors were presented in random orde
r in the same session and when reinforcement probability for correct respon
ding was decreased from 1 to 0.5. Memory for these eight odors, assessed un
der extinction after a 3t day rest period, was essentially perfect. Time sp
ent sampling the odor on S+ and S- trials was highly correlated with respon
se accuracy When accuracy was at chance levels (e.g. initial trials on a no
vel task), stimulus sampling time on both S+ and S- trials was similar to 0
.5-0.7 s. As response accuracy increased, sampling time on S+ trials tended
to increase and remain higher than sampling time on S- trials.