Ac. Powers et al., Comparative analysis of epitope recognition of glutamic acid decarboxylase(GAD) by autoantibodies from different autoimmune disorders, CLIN EXP IM, 118(3), 1999, pp. 349-356
Autoantibodies to GAD, an important marker of the autoimmune process in typ
e I or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), are also found in non-di
abetic individuals with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS1), AP
S2, and stiff man syndrome (SMS). Most IDDM sera contain two distinct GAD a
ntibody specificities, one of which targets an epitope region in the middle
-third of GAD65 (IDDM-E1; amino acids 221-359) and one of which targets the
carboxy-third of GAD65 (IDDM-E2; amino acids 453-569). Using 11 chimeric G
AD65/GAD67 proteins to maintain conformation-dependent epitopes of GAD65, w
e compared the humoral repertoire of IgG antibodies from an individual with
APS2-like disease (b35, b78, and b96) and MoAbs from an IDDM patient (MICA
-2, MICA-3, and MICA-4). Neither the APS2 IgG antibodies nor the IDDM MoAbs
bind the amino-terminal third of GAD65, but instead target the carboxy-ter
minal two-thirds of GAD65. Amino acids 270-359 (IDDM-E1) are targeted by on
e APS2 IgG antibody and MICA-4, while two other APS2 IgG antibodies, MICA-2
and MICA-3, target amino acids 443-585 (IDDM-E2). Using GAD65/67 chimera t
hat span the IDDM-E2 region, we found that MICA-2 binds amino acids 514-528
of GAD65, but two APS2 IgG antibodies require this region and amino acids
529-570. In contrast, the binding of MICA-3 requires two discontinuous amin
o acid segments of GAD65 (452-513 and 528-569), but not amino acids 514-528
. These results indicate that there are both similarities and differences i
n the humoral response to GAD65 in APS2 and IDDM.