Sometimes progress is hard to see, when looking at the big picture, because
there is very little of it. But sometimes progress is hard to see because
the big picture is out of focus. When perioperative deaths ascribed to anae
sthesia are in the order of 1 in 20 000 operations and even changes in majo
r morbidity require massive sample sizes to detect, neuroanaesthesia's most
emphatic yardstick of progress is too crude to measure advances that have
occurred over the most recent decade. We clearly need to become more famili
ar with neuropsychological tests that can detect subtle changes. Today, for
elective neurosurgery, we are primarily in the business of doing two thing
s - pushing the envelope for surgical intervention to include cases that wo
uld have been considered too risky 15 years ago, and reducing the frequency
of ''Uncle-Joe-has-never-been-the-same-since-they-operated-on-his-brain sy
ndrome''. Both of these areas of progress are empirically measurable, but w
e have not made much progress towards measuring them. Of course, this measu
rement problem plagues anaesthesiology generally, and we need to attend to
it in general. Meanwhile, saying where we are relative to the recent past a
nd the near future involves a lot of guesswork. What follows is my guesswor
k about progress in neurosurgical anaesthesiology.