Effectiveness of Harpagophytum extract WS 1531 in the treatment of exacerbation of low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study

Citation
S. Chrubasik et al., Effectiveness of Harpagophytum extract WS 1531 in the treatment of exacerbation of low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, EUR J ANAES, 16(2), 1999, pp. 118-129
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
02650215 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
118 - 129
Database
ISI
SICI code
0265-0215(199902)16:2<118:EOHEW1>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Two daily doses of oral Harpagophytum extract WS 1531 (600 and 1200, respec tively, containing 50 and 100 mg of the marker harpagoside) were compared w ith placebo over 4 weeks in a randomized, double-blind study in 197 patient s with chronic susceptibility to back pain and current exacerbations that w ere producing pain worse than 5 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. The princi pal outcome measure, based on pilot studies, was the number of patients who were pain free without the permitted rescue medication (tramadol) for 5 da ys out of the last week. The treatment and placebo groups were well matched in physical characteristics, in the severity of pain, duration, nature and accompaniments of their pain, the Arhus low back pain index and in laborat ory indices of organ system function. A total of 183 patients completed the study. The numbers of pain-free patients were three, six and 10 in the pla cebo group (P), the Harpagophytum 600 group (H-600) and the Harpagophytum 1 200 group (H-1200) respectively (P=0.027, one-tailed Cochrane-Armitage test ). The majority of responders' were patients who had suffered less than 42 days of pain, and subgroup analyses suggested that the effect was confined to patients with more severe and radiating pain accompanied by neurological deficit. However, subsidiary analyses, concentrating on the current pain c omponent of the Arhus index, painted a slightly different picture, with the benefits seeming, if anything, to be greatest in the H-600 group and in pa tients without more severe pain, radiation or neurological deficit. Patient s with more pain tended to use more tramadol, but even severe and unbearabl e pain would not guarantee that tramadol would be used at all, and certainl y not to the maximum permitted dose. There was no evidence for Harpagophytu m-related side-effects, except possibly for mild and infrequent gastrointes tinal symptoms.