Establishing landslide chronologies is essential both for understanding cau
ses of mass movements as part of fundamental geomorphological research, and
for the assessment of landslide hazards as part of applied geomorphology.
We discuss the applicability of different methods for determining landslide
chronologies, frequencies and dynamics in relation to the type of material
being dated, sampling location and type of mass movement. The emphasis is
on the possibilities and limitations of the different dating methods.
Established methods such as radiocarbon dating, lichenometry and dendrochro
nology are briefly discussed. The paper focuses, however, on (1) new analyt
ical techniques like Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS), Thermally Ionisin
g Mass Spectrometry (TIMS) and laser fusion, which have led to significant
improvements of established dating methods and on (2) new dating methods Li
ke Optically-Stimulated-Luminescence (OSL) dating and Alpha-Recoil-Track (A
RT) dating. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. AU rights reserved.