A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma

Citation
M. Kato et al., A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma, HEP-GASTRO, 46(30), 1999, pp. 3281-3286
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology","da verificare
Journal title
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01726390 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
30
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3281 - 3286
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-6390(199911/12)46:30<3281:ACOTPS>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To clarify what staging system of lymph node metastasis is suitable for evaluating prognosis of gastric cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed the survival 5 years after operation of 186 advanc ed gastric cancer patients who underwent potentially curative gastric resec tion. The following 3 systems were compared using multivariate analyses by the logistic regression model. Nodal status in pathology was classified as follows: (a) nodal stage according to the General Rules for the Gastric Can cer Study of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (the Japanese Rules), (b) number of metastatic nodes according to the new UICC staging s ystem (the TNM system), (c) number of metastatic nodes in nl group of the J apanese. Rules (the new classification). RESULTS: The TNM system revealed better results than the nodal stage in sen sitivity and -2 log likelihood. The new classification revealed the best re sult among the 3 systems in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and -2 log l ikelihood. CONCLUSIONS: The TNM system is a better prognostic factor than the nodal st age in the Japanese Rules, and the new classification is the best prognosti c factor of the above 3 systems in potentially curative advanced gastric ca ncer patients. Furthermore, the new classification might be useful in compa ring data between some facilities.