Research on applicant faking has generally employed group comparison design
s in order to investigate the prevalence and effects of intentional respons
e distortion on noncognitive selection tests. Unfortunately, these studies
do not tell us which applicants are most likely to successfully fake their
responses or the situational conditions which are most likely to induce exc
essive faking. In an effort to understand individual differences in intenti
onal response distortion, an interactional model of applicant faking is pro
posed. Because successful faking requires both a motivation to fake the tes
t and the ability to fake, the situational and dispositional factors influe
ncing these facets are described. Where possible, research from the faking
literature is used to verify the model. Studies of academic cheating, emplo
yee theft, deception and antisocial behavior are also presented in order to
provide empirical support for the proposed model.