Purpose: The objectives of this study are to describe the utilization of su
rgery and of radiotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed rectal cancer
in Ontario between 1982 and 1994, and to describe the probability of perma
nent colostomy at any time after the diagnosis of rectal cancer, as an outc
ome of the treatment of newly diagnosed rectal cancer.
Methods and Materials: Electronic records of rectal cancer (International C
lassification of Diseases code 154) from the Ontario Cancer Registry (n = 1
8,695, excluding squamous, basaloid, cloacogenic, and carcinoid histology)
were linked to surgical records from all Ontario hospitals, and radiotherap
y (RT) records from Ontario cancer centers. Procedures occurring within 4 m
onths of diagnosis, or within 4 months of another procedure for rectal canc
er, were considered part of initial treatment. Multivariate analyses contro
lled for age, sex, and year of diagnosis.
Results: Resection plus permanent colostomy was performed in 33.1% of cases
, whereas local excision or resection without permanent colostomy was perfo
rmed in 38.2%. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated higher odds ra
tios (OR) for resection plus permanent colostomy in all regions of Ontario
relative to Toronto. The OR for postoperative RT following local excision o
r resection without permanent colostomy varied among the regions relative t
o Toronto (e.g., OR Ottawa = 0.59, OR Hamilton = 0.76, OR London = 1.25). T
he relative risk (RR) of colostomy conditional upon survival within 5 years
from diagnosis varied among regions relative to Toronto (e.g., RR Ottawa =
1.21, RR Hamilton = 1.20).
Conclusions: There is regional variation in the utilization of resection wi
th permanent colostomy, and in the utilization of postoperative RT among ca
ses not undergoing permanent colostomy. Regions with higher initial rates o
f resection plus permanent colostomy continue to experience higher probabil
ity of permanent colostomy 5 years after diagnosis of rectal cancer. Higher
initial rates of permanent colostomy may be malleable to interventions aim
ed at improving overall outcomes. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.