Yc. Vanlandewijck et al., Field test evaluation of aerobic, anaerobic, and wheelchair basketball skill performances, INT J SP M, 20(8), 1999, pp. 548-554
Forty-six male wheelchair basketball players performed a set of field rests
to evaluate aerobic capacity (25 m shuttle run), anaerobic capacity (30 s
sprint), and six specific wheelchair basketball skills. Overall test-retest
reliability (n = 20) ranged from r = 0.65 to r = 0.97. To study the validi
ty (criterion related evidence) of the shuttle run test, heart rate (HR) wa
s recorded for 15 subjects, who also performed a continuous, multistage arm
cranking exercise until volitional fatigue. Moderate to high correlations
were calculated between shuttle run distances covered (1375 +/- 243,6 m) an
d (V) over dot O(2)max (2208 +/- 461.6 mL/min) and POmax (93.8 +/- 17.97 W)
, measured during maximal arm cranking (respectively r = 0.64 and r = 0.87)
. Maximal HR during shuttle run (174.9 +/- 16.6 B/min) and arm cranking (16
9 +/- 14.21 B/min) were correlated (r = 0.78). High correlations between sh
uttle run test and anaerobic field tests, however, indicate high implicatio
n of anaerobic and wheelchair manoeuvrability performances. The 30 s sprint
test was validated (n = 15) against a Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) on a r
oller ergometer. Comparing distance (field test: 90 +/- 6.7 m) with mean po
wer output (WAnT: 852.1 +/- 234.9 W) the correlation was r = 0.93. Principa
l components factor analysis identified 'wheelchair propulsion dynamics' an
d 'eye-hand-coordination' as the underlying constructs of the six skill pro
ficiency measurements, accounting for 80.1% of the variance. In conclusion,
the newly developed field test battery is a reliable and valid tool for; a
naerobic capacity and skill proficiency assessment in wheelchair basketball
players.