Background: Previous studies have shown that applicants for postgraduate tr
aining may misrepresent research citations. We evaluated the research citat
ions that mere identified in a review of the Publications and Work and Rese
arch sections from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data
for all applicants to our orthopaedic residency program for the 1998 to 19
99 academic gear.
Methods: The citations were searched for on Medline. We initially used the
name of the first author, then the name of the applicant, the name of the j
ournal, the volume number, the issue number, and the page numbers, When a j
ournal was not listed in Medline, an interlibrary search was instituted wit
h use of the same format. When no match was made for any category, the cita
tion was defined as misrepresented. Point estimates are reported as percent
ages.
Results: Publications were listed on sixty-four (30.0 percent) of 213 appli
cations. One hundred and thirty-eight publications were cited; there were f
ifteen citations (10.9 percent) to book chapters, twenty-sis (18.8 percent)
to journals not listed in Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory, an
d twenty-one (15.2 percent) to articles listed as in press, in print, or su
bmitted for publication. Seventy-sis articles that had been cited as appear
ing in journals listed in Ulrich's Directory were checked and verified. Fou
rteen (18 percent) of these seventy-sis publications mere misrepresented, M
isrepresentations included citations of nonexistent articles in actual jour
nals and nonauthorship of existing articles.
Conclusions: We concluded that publications listed on postgraduate applicat
ions should be scrutinized carefully, Copies of cited publications should b
e required by residency programs before applications are considered complet
e, The importance of professionalism needs to be emphasized in the curricul
a of medical schools. Residency training programs should develop guidelines
regarding misrepresentation.