We investigated why self-produced tactile stimulation is perceived as less
intense than the same stimulus produced externally. A tactile stimulus on t
he palm of the right hand was either externally produced, by a robot or sel
f-produced by the subject. In the conditions in which the tactile stimulus
was self-produced, subjects moved the arm of a robot with their left hand t
o produce the tactile stimulus on their right hand via a second rebut. Subj
ects were asked to rate intensity of the tactile sensation and consistently
rated self-produced tactile stimuli as less tickly, intense, and pleasant
than externally produced tactile stimuli. Using this robotic setup we were
able to manipulate the correspondence between the action of the subjects' l
eft hand and the tactile stimulus on their right hand. First, we parametric
ally varied the delay between the movement of the left hand and the resulta
nt movement of the tactile stimulus on the right hand. Second, we implement
ed varying degrees of trajectory perturbation and varied the direction of t
he tactile stimulus movement as a function of the direction of left-hand mo
vement. The tickliness rating increased significantly with increasing delay
and trajectory perturbation. This suggests that self-produced movements at
tenuate the resultant tactile sensation and that a necessary requirement of
this attenuation is that the tactile stimulus and its causal motor command
correspond in time and space. We propose that the extent to which self-pro
duced tactile sensation is attenuated (i.e., its tickliness) is proportiona
l to the error between the sensory feedback predicted by an internal forwar
d model of the motor system and the actual sensory feedback produced by the
movement.