A. Luca et al., Effects of end-to-side portacaval shunt and distal splenorenal shunt on systemic and pulmonary haemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis, J GASTR HEP, 14(11), 1999, pp. 1112-1118
Background: Patients with cirrhosis exhibit splanchnic, peripheral and pulm
onary vasodilation, which are thought to play a role in increasing portal p
ressure, promoting sodium retention and determining arterial hypoxaemia. Th
e present study investigated whether these abnormalities are influenced by
portal hypertension or by portal systemic shunting.
Methods: Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis who had haemodynamic measurement
s before and after end-to-side portacaval shunt (n=30) or distal splenorena
l shunt (n=31) were evaluated.
Results: End-to-side portacaval shunts were more effective than distal sple
norenal shunts in decompressing the portal system (portocaval pressure grad
ient 3.2+/-2.5 vs splenocaval gradient 6.5+/-3.2 mmHg, P<0.0001), because o
f a greater shunt blood flow (33+/-12 vs 21+/-12 mL/min per kg, P<0.005). A
zygos blood flow and hepatic blood flow decreased significantly after both
surgical shunts. However, end-to-side portacaval shunts caused a greater de
crease in peripheral resistance than distal splenorenal shunts (-23+/-18 vs
-11+/-27%, P<0.05). Mean arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistan
ce were significantly reduced after an end-to-side portacaval shunt (-7+/-1
0%, P<0.001 and -14+/-33%, P<0.004, respectively), but not after splenorena
l shunt.
Conclusions: These results show that end-to-side portacaval shunts, despite
normalizing portal pressure, worsen the peripheral and pulmonary vasodilat
ation. The splenorenal shunt that maintained a higher portal pressure, caus
ed less peripheral vasodilatation and did not enhance pulmonary vasodilatat
ion. These findings suggest that portal systemic shunting is more important
than increased portal pressure in determining peripheral vasodilatation in
cirrhosis. (C) 1999 Blackwell Science Asia Pry Ltd.