Lamellar bone is common among primates, either in the form of extended plan
ar circumferential arrays, or as cylindrically shaped osteons. Osteonal bon
e generally replaces circumferential lamellar bone with time, and it is the
refore of much interest to compare the mechanical properties and fracture b
ehavior of these two forms of lamellar bone. This is, however, difficult as
natural specimens of circumferential lamellar bone large enough for standa
rd mechanical tests are not available. We found that as a result of treatme
nt with large doses of alendronate, the lateral sides of the diaphyses of b
aboon tibia contained fairly extensive regions of circumferential lamellar
bone, the structure of which appears to be indistinguishable from untreated
lamellar bone. Three-point bending tests were used to determine the elasti
c and ultimate properties of almost pure circumferential lamellar bone and
osteonal bone in four different orientations relative to the tibia long axi
s. After taking into account the differences in porosity and extent of mine
ralization of the two bone types, the flexural modulus, bending strength, f
racture strain and nominal work-to-fracture properties were similar for the
same orientations, with some exceptions. This implies that it is the lamel
lar structure itself that is mainly responsible for these mechanical proper
ties. The fracture behavior and morphologies of the fracture surfaces varie
d significantly with orientation in both types of bone. This is related to
the microstructure of lamellar bone. Osteonal bone exhibited quite differen
t damage-related behavior during fracture as compared to circumferential la
mellar bone. Following fracture the two halves of osteonal bone remained at
tached whereas in circumferential lamellar bone they separated. These diffe
rences could well provide significant adaptive advantages to osteonal bone
function. (C) 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.