Tj. Silk et al., EFFECTS ON DOSE COEFFICIENTS FOR WORKERS OF RECENT CHANGES IN INTERNAL DOSIMETRY, Radiation protection dosimetry, 71(1), 1997, pp. 7-21
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging","Nuclear Sciences & Tecnology
The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has rec
ently reviewed and updated, in ICRP Publications 56, 67 and 69, some o
f the biokinetic models of ICRP Publication 30. As well as this, ICRP
has adopted a new model for the human respiratory tract, the details o
f which were issued as ICRP Publication 66. A compendium of dose coeff
icients (dose per unit intake values) for workers based on the new lun
g model, and some new recommendations on systemic models, has been iss
ued in ICRP Publication 68. Doses for inhalation of 1 and 5 mu m Activ
ity Median Aerodynamic Diameter (AMAD) aerosols and for ingestion are
given here for a selection of important nuclides, using the latest lun
g and systemic models. The results are compared with those of previous
models. The new Absorption Types F, M, S (Fast, Moderate and Slow) ar
e compared with the old inhalation Classes D, W, Y (for retention peri
ods Days, Weeks, Years). It is found that generally the dominating fac
tor for Types F and S is the lower overall deposition in the new model
, leading to lower doses. Type M material is retained in the lung for
much longer than Class W material of the ICRP Publication 30 model. Th
is overrides the lower deposition and lung doses are higher in most ca
ses. For 5 mu m aerosols (the new default for occupational exposure) t
he activity reaching blood for Types F and M is similar to that for 1
mu m (the previous default) Class D and W aerosols. However, the amoun
t for Type S is only around 10% of that for Class Y. Doses to systemic
tissues are reduced accordingly. A detailed investigation of systemic
uptake is given in the Appendix. Further changes in systemic tissue d
oses are caused by some substantial changes to biokinetic models. Comm
itted effective doses are generally lower although there are some exce
ptions. Differences in doses by ingestion are more simply explained by
changes to systemic models and some other relatively minor changes.