Comparison of treadmill exercise echocardiography before and after exercise in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease
J. Peteiro et al., Comparison of treadmill exercise echocardiography before and after exercise in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, J AM S ECHO, 12(12), 1999, pp. 1073-1079
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Objectives: We sought to compare the feasibility and accuracy of peak tread
mill exercise echocardiography versus postexercise echocardiography imaging
.
Background: Although peak exercise echocardiography has been reported for b
oth supine and orthostatic bicycle exercise and has shown higher sensitivit
y than postexercise imaging, acquiring images at peak exercise with treadmi
ll has not been explored.
Methods: Peak and post-treadmill exercise echocardiography and coronary ang
iography mere performed on 89 patients with known or suspected coronary art
ery disease, Positive exercise echocardiography was defined as necrosis or
ischemic response, Positive coronary angiography was defined as greater tha
n or equal to 1 diseased vessels (greater than or equal to 50% luminal narr
owing). Images were analyzed in a blind manner by an expert observer.
Results: Postexercise images were acquired within 80 seconds after exercise
(40 +/- 14). Mean heart rate (bpm) was 139 +/- 22 at peak versus 118 +/- 2
5 at postexercise imaging (P < .001). Interpretable peak and postexercise i
mages were obtained for all 89 patients, Of the 72 classified as having pos
itive exercise echocardiography, 23 had new regional wall motion abnormalit
y at peak (21 with positive angiography), which resolved at postexercise im
aging. Sensitivity was higher with peak than with postexercise imaging (94%
vs 73%, P < .001). Specificity was similar (68% vs 79%), as mas predictive
positive value (92% vs 93%). Negative predictive value was again higher wi
th peak imaging (76% vs 44%, P < .05). Total accuracy was higher with peak
imaging (89% vs 74%, P < .05).
Conclusions: Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography is technically feasib
le and has higher sensitivity and accuracy than post-treadmill exercise ech
ocardiography. Therefore in the clinical setting peak exercise echocardiogr
aphy should be performed to diagnose ischemia.