Objective: Protection of the brain is a primary concern in aortic arch surg
ery. Retrograde cerebral perfusion is a relatively new technique used for c
erebral protection during profound hypothermic circulatory arrest. This stu
dy was designed to compare, retrospectively, the outcome of 109 patients un
dergoing aortic arch operation with and without the use of retrograde cereb
ral perfusion. Methods : Fifty-five patients had profound hypothermic circu
latory arrest alone, and 54 patients had supplemental cerebral protection w
ith retrograde cerebral perfusion. Mean age was 61 +/- 13 years and 58 +/-
14 years, respectively (mean +/- standard deviation). Twenty-two preoperati
ve and intraoperative characteristics, including age, sex, acuity, presence
of aortic dissection, and aneurysm rupture, were similar in the 2 groups (
P >.05). Results: Mean circulatory arrest times (in minutes) were 30 +/- 19
in the group without retrograde cerebral perfusion and 33 +/- 19 in the gr
oup with retrograde cerebral perfusion, respectively. chi(2) Analysis revea
led that patients operated on with the use of retrograde cerebral perfusion
had significantly lower hospital mortality (15% vs 31%; P =.04) and in-hos
pital permanent neurologic complications (9% vs 27%; P = .01), Retrograde c
erebral perfusion failed to reduce the prevalence of temporary neurologic d
ysfunction (17% vs 18%; P = .9). Stepwise multiple logistic regression reve
aled that extracorporeal circulation time, age, and lack of retrograde cere
bral perfusion were statistically significant independent risk factors for
hospital mortality The same analysis revealed that lack of retrograde cereb
ral perfusion was the only significant independent risk factor for permanen
t neurologic dysfunction, Conclusion: Retrograde cerebral perfusion decreas
ed the prevalence of permanent neurologic complications and the hospital mo
rtality in patients undergoing aortic arch operations.