Objectives: To review the evidence for the effectiveness of popular, non-pr
escription weight loss supplements.
Data sources: A detailed literature search including all relevant medical a
nd supplementary medicine databases and evidence submitted from manufacture
rs.
Data synthesis: The theoretical basis and rationale for the use of each sub
stance is considered along with available research in the published literat
ure on effectiveness and potential risks. We classified the level of eviden
ce represented by the main research studies on each substance.
Conclusions: There is no good evidence for any weight loss benefits from mo
st of the substances reviewed here. There is some support for mild effects
of capsaicin, caffeine and fibre, but only in whole foods. In some cases le
g, chitosan), there is a plausible theoretical basis for the product, but n
o supporting proof of effect in humans in the absence of a calorie-controll
ed diet. Possible synergistic effects of different ingredients cannot be di
smissed, but cannot be assessed from current data. There is an absence of g
ood quality research on many substances, which means that advertising claim
s may be misleading.