Long-term results after combined modality treatment for non-metastatic osteosarcoma

Citation
J. Aparicio et al., Long-term results after combined modality treatment for non-metastatic osteosarcoma, MED ONCOL, 16(4), 1999, pp. 255-260
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
13570560 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
255 - 260
Database
ISI
SICI code
1357-0560(199912)16:4<255:LRACMT>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Since the introduction of multimodality treatment, the prognosis of patient s with high-grade non-metastatic osteosarcoma has significantly improved. A retrospective review was performed to assess the long-term results of this approach in a single centre setting, and to investigate the impact of pote ntial clinical prognostic factors. Between 1985 and 1993, 35 patients with stage II-A and II-B osteosarcoma underwent preoperative chemotherapy (high- dose methotrexate), wide surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin-doxo rubicin/bleomycin-cyclophosphamide-dactinomycin) (modified T-10A protocol). There were 19 males and 16 females. Median patient age was 17 y (range 12- 42). Primary tumour sites were the extremities (83%) and axial bones (17%). In spite of an unfavourable grade 3-4 histologic response rate to high-dos e methotrexate of 12%, 31 (88%) patients were able to undergo limb-sparing surgery and 28 (80%) were rendered disease free after the planned therapy. Median follow-up was 8 y. The actuarial overall survival and disease-free s urvival rates were 64% and 49% at 5 y, and 59% and 49% at 10 y, respectivel y. Tumour size and primary site were significant prognostic factors for sur vival in univariate analyses. In conclusion, long-term survival after combi ned modality treatment can be achieved in more than 60% of patients with lo calised osteosarcoma, including non-appendicular lesions. Limb-sparing surg ery is a realistic goal for most cases. The prognostic value of tumour necr osis and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be interpreted acc ording to individual high-dose methotrexate scheduling.