Antiretroviral drugs have, as any medical therapy, their natural history. T
hey are born by screening or designing of molecules with activity against H
IV, their efficacy and safety is investigated by clinical trials, evaluated
by regulatory bodies, used by clinical practice, and finally analyzed by q
uality of care, economic, social and ethical studies. This flow of informat
ion is dynamically accumulated, but it may stop if negative results are obt
ained. The described knowledge pathway implies that specific methods are ne
eded to answer different questions. At the same time, many decisions have t
o be taken in order to keep the process flowing, including multiple agents,
such as drug industries, government departments, clinicians, health care p
roviders and health policy makers.
This paper describes a comprehensive conceptual framework, including the mu
ch less than knowledge much greater than on antiretroviral drugs, the much
less than methodologies much greater than needed to generate them, and the
underlying processes of much less than decision making much greater than. I
t proposes the need for a continuum of assessment of these drugs.