Immunization outreach in an inner-city housing development: Reminder-recall on foot

Citation
Kp. Goldstein et al., Immunization outreach in an inner-city housing development: Reminder-recall on foot, PEDIATRICS, 104(6), 1999, pp. E691-E696
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
00314005 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
E691 - E696
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(199912)104:6<E691:IOIAIH>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objective. To determine rates of immunization coverage among children 3 to 72 months of age in a large public housing development, to develop a commun ity-based outreach program to increase coverage, and to evaluate the effect of the program. Design. A door-to-door canvass of the development by specially trained emer gency medical technicians to enroll families, to determine immunization sta tus from written records, and to follow-up to encourage immunizations and w ell-child care. The program was evaluated, comparing rates of immunization by age with an expectation based on the immunization histories before enrol lment. Setting. A Chicago public housing development, October 1993 through Decembe r 1996. Outcome Variables. Antigen-specific and series-specific coverage based on w ritten records. Results. Of the caregivers, 92% were able to identify a primary care provid er. At the time of enrollment, 37% of 1075 children were up-to-date, but th at proportion varied by age with 27% of children 19 to 35 months of age bei ng up-to-date. The program increased rates of immunization compared with th e expectation from the preenrollment rates. At their final assessment, 50% of the children were up-to-date. For individual vaccines, there was a posit ive program effect. For example, before enrollment, 22% of children 15 mont hs of age had received measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. However, 39% of children who were enrolled in the program before they were 12 months of ag e had received their first immunizations by 15 months of age. Conclusions. Children in the housing development had very low rates of immu nization before enrollment. An in-person intervention was effective in reac hing families and determining immunization status. In the 3-year enrollment and observation period, rates of immunization increased.