Previous large series of outcome following pituitary surgery for acromegaly
, including our own, have demonstrated poor results, with cure, defined as
CH <5 mU/l, achieved in only 33-42% of patients. In our previous series, su
rgery was performed by one of eight different surgeons. Largely based on th
e disappointing results of this previous audit of outcome, our practice sin
ce 1990 has been, whenever possible, to refer all patients with acromegaly
to a dedicated pituitary surgeon (APJ). The objective of the current study
was to re-analyse the outcome of surgical treatment for acromegaly since in
stituting this change. Tumour size and extension was determined on CT/MRI s
canning. Biochemical cure was defined as a basal GH <5 mU/I or a nadir GH o
f <2 mU/I across an OGTT following initial pituitary surgery. Surgery was p
erformed on 66 patients and 42 (64%) were cured, compared with 26/78 (33%)
in our previous study (p < 0.0005, chi(2) test). The cure rate for microade
nomas (n=22) was 86%, and for macroadenomas 52%, compared with 54% (p<0.05,
chi(2) test) and 30% (p<0.05, chi(2) test) respectively, in our previous s
tudy. We conclude that surgical outcome for acromegaly is enhanced if patie
nts are operated on by a single experienced surgeon.