The efficiency of in-situ hybridization on human chromosomes with alphoid DNAs is enhanced by previous digestion with AluI and TaqI

Citation
M. Nieddu et al., The efficiency of in-situ hybridization on human chromosomes with alphoid DNAs is enhanced by previous digestion with AluI and TaqI, CHROMOS RES, 7(8), 1999, pp. 593-602
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
CHROMOSOME RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09673849 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
8
Year of publication
1999
Pages
593 - 602
Database
ISI
SICI code
0967-3849(199912)7:8<593:TEOIHO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Centromeric alphoid DNAs of human chromosomes 6, 9, 16 and Y were employed to obtain information on the molecular mechanism(s) determining cytological effects produced by digestion in situ with AluI and TaqI restriction enzym es, possibly related to the structure of the above-cited areas. The followi ng cytological and biochemical experiments were carried out using the above -mentioned alphoid sequences as probes: (1) standard in-situ hybridization and in-situ hybridization after chromosome cleavage with AluI/TaqI, and (2) filter hybridization on the DNA fractions obtained from the material solub ilized and that retained on the slides after digestion in situ with AluI/Ta qI. Biochemical data show that cleavage of alphoid DNAs is not prevented by the peculiar organization of centromeric heterochromatin, but such cleavag e is not necessarily followed by complete DNA solubilization. The analysis of alphoid sequence cleavage in naked genomic DNA as well as during digesti on of fixed chromosomes shows that (1) AluI cuts more efficiently than TaqI , (2) DNA fragments as large as 3-5 kb can be solubilized, and (3) DNA frag ments of the same size are found in both fractions of DNA, i.e. that retain ed on the chromosomes as well as that solubilized from chromosomes. Cytolog ical data show that previous chromosome digestion, mostly with TaqI, increa ses the hybridization signal area, suggesting that this fact might be due t o (1) chromatin reorganization produced by enzyme attack and/or (2) the pre sence of alphoid DNAs which might be restricted not only to the kinetochore area but also to para/peri-centromeric heterochromatin. Lastly, centromere DNA solubilization as a consequence of restriction enzyme cleavage seems t o vary from chromosome to chromosome, thus suggesting that centromeric regi ons do not represent a homogeneous class of constitutive heterochromatin.