Low-dose dopamine (LDD) is commonly used after kidney transplantation as a
renoprotective agent, although the benefits of dopamine (DA) in this settin
g are controversial. LDD increases renal blood flow, decreases resistive in
dex (RI) and causes diuresis in normal kidneys. We hypothesised that the va
sculature of a denervated renal transplant may not respond to DA in the sam
e way as healthy native kidneys. In a prospective, controlled study, renal
blood flow velocity and vascular resistance were measured by Doppler ultras
ound in recent kidney transplants (n = 20) over a range of DA doses (0-5 mu
g/kg/min). Main renal artery velocity was lower in kidneys with acute rena
l dysfunction than in those with normal function (0.60 +/- 0.31 vs. 0.81 +/
- 0.24. respectively, p < 0.05). There was no demonstrable haemodynamic eff
ect of LDD on either RI or main renal artery velocity as measured by Dopple
r ultrasound. Interestingly, the only significant correlation with mean RI
was trough cyclosporin A level (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Technical or timing f
actors cannot be used to explain the absence of DA effect, with equivalent
doses capable of producing vasodilatation and reduced RI in studies of norm
al kidneys. In summary, these findings contrast the DA response of healthy
native kidneys and may explain studies showing no clinical benefit of LDD i
n the early post-transplant period. These data suggest an insensitivity of
recently implanted kidneys to the vasodilatory effects of LDD, that other f
actors such as cyclosporin A vasoconstriction may also be important, and qu
estion the rationale for routine LDD after kidney transplantation.