Computer-assisted immunocytochemical determination of breast cancer steroid receptors on cytological smears of excised surgical specimens compared with frozen sections
A. Cavaliere et al., Computer-assisted immunocytochemical determination of breast cancer steroid receptors on cytological smears of excised surgical specimens compared with frozen sections, CYTOMETRY, 38(6), 1999, pp. 301-305
Background: Due to the widespread use of fine needle aspirate biopsy the pr
actice of determining estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors in brea
st carcinoma from cytological smears (CS) is becoming very common, The aim
of this study was to determine concordance between ER and PR assessed by im
munocytochemical assay (ICA) on CS and FS both evaluated by image analysis
since we have found no data in literature on this. Methods: 104 breast carc
inoma cases were selected. For all cases ER and PR determination was perfor
med on CS, obtained by light scraping of the freshly cut surface of the exc
ised surgical tumors at the time of frozen section diagnosis, and FS using
the same monoclonal antibodies. Computer-assisted image analysis was perfor
med in all cases using CAS 200. Results were expressed as percent positive
area of neoplastic nuclei compared with total nuclear area of the examined
neoplastic cells. Results: Good correlation was demonstrated between percen
t positive nuclear neoplastic area by ER-ICA on CS and FS (r = 0.759; P < 0
.0001). Concordance of results was 90.19% (P < 0.001). Good correlation was
also demonstrated between percent positive nuclear neoplastic area by PR-I
CA in CS and FS (r = 0.889; P < 0.0001). Concordance of results was 97.02%
(P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our data suggest that ICA on CS with automated i
mage analysis is efficient in evaluating ER and PR content in human breast
cancer, especially when CS is the only method pathologists have to evaluate
receptor status e.g. in advanced breast cancer cases when neoadjuvant ther
apy is necessary before surgery or when surgery is impossible. Cytometry (C
omm. Clin. Cytometry) 38:301-305, 1999. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.