Clonality of cutaneous B-cell infiltrates determined by microdissection and immunoglobulin gene rearrangement

Citation
S. Signoretti et al., Clonality of cutaneous B-cell infiltrates determined by microdissection and immunoglobulin gene rearrangement, DIAGN MOL P, 8(4), 1999, pp. 176-182
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
10529551 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
176 - 182
Database
ISI
SICI code
1052-9551(199912)8:4<176:COCBID>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Diagnosis of primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) is supported by the demonstration of a monoclonal B-cell population. Immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene-rearrangement analysis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a reliable technique to detect B-cell monoclonality in paraffin-embedded tiss ue, but the presence of numerous reactive B lymphocytes in PCBCL may compli cate the interpretation of clonality test results. To test this hypothesis, IgH gene-rearrangement analysis by PCR was performed on paraffin-embedded whole tissue sections of 19 cutaneous B-cell infiltrates diagnosed either a s consistent with PCBCL (10 specimens) or unclassified lymphoid infiltrates (ULI) (9 specimens). In specimens that did not show monoclonal bands by Ig H gene-rearrangement on DNA extracted from whole tissue sections, clonality assays were repeated on microdissected B-cell subpopulations suspicious fo r neoplastic cells. In the analysis of whole tissue sections, 4 (40%) of 10 specimens consistent with PCBCL showed one or two monoclonal bands, wherea s 9 of 9 ULI specimens showed either a ladder or a smear. Clonality analysi s of microdissected B-cell subpopulations showed 3 additional PCBCL specime ns (total, 7 of 10) and 1 ULI specimen (total, 1 of 9) with unequivocal and reproducible monoclonal bands. Addition of microdissection increases the s ensitivity of PCR-based B-cell clonality assay in PCBCL compared with analy sis performed on the whole section (70% versus 40% monoclonal cases) and al lows the recognition of a dominant clone in ULI specimens, possibly represe nting early PCBCL.