Objective: Safety and effectiveness of acoustic reflex tests are important
issues because these tests are widely applied to screen for retrocochlear p
athology. Previous studies have reported moderately high sensitivity and sp
ecificity for detection of acoustic neuroma. However, there have been repor
ts of possible iatrogenic hearing loss resulting from acoustic reflex thres
hold (ART) and decay (ARD) tests. This study assessed safety and clinical p
erformance of ART tests for detection of acoustic neuroma.
Design: We report a case in which ARD testing resulted in a significant bil
ateral permanent threshold shift. This case was the impetus for us to inves
tigate the clinical utility of ART and ARD tests. We analyzed sensitivity a
nd specificity of ART, as well as asymmetry in pure-tone thresholds (PTT) f
or detection of acoustic neuroma in 56 tumor and 108 non-tumor ears.
Results and Conclusions: Sensitivity and specificity were higher for PTT as
ymmetry than for ART. Ipsilateral ART at 1000 Hz had poor sensitivity and s
pecificity for detection of acoustic neuroma, and involves some potential r
isk to residual hearing for presentation levels higher than 115 dB SPL. App
roximately half of the acoustic neuroma group had ipsilateral ARTs that wou
ld require administration of ARD tests at levels exceeding 115 dB SPL. Ther
efore, we conclude that PTT asymmetry is a more effective test for detectio
n of acoustic neuroma, and involves no risk to residual hearing. Future stu
dies of contralateral reflex threshold and ARD in combination with PTT asym
metry are recommended.