The use of energy cost as an indicator of natural resource quality is exami
ned. Energy cost is the direct and indirect energy used to produce a unit o
f a resource commodity. Different approaches to the role of energy in the e
conomy are discussed and it is demonstrated theoretically that energy cost
can give false indications of changes in resource quality. This is because
energy cost is only an accurate indicator of resource quality if either ene
rgy is the single primary factor of production and the economy can be repre
sented by an input-output model, or if there is substitutability between th
e factors of production, then marginal products must be proportional to the
factors' embodied energy. These conditions are tested empirically using da
ta from the US agricultural sector. The results show that there is substitu
tability and marginal products are not proportional to embodied energy. How
ever, the strong neoclassical assumption of price-taking profit-maximizatio
n can be rejected at a 5% level of significance, though not at the 3.5% lev
el. The generality of the empirical results may be restricted due to data l
imitations but the theoretical framework can be applied to other data sets,
other resources, and even other indicators. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.
All rights reserved.