In posterior rhinomanometry (PRM), oropharyngeal pressure is measured using
a tube placed between the tongue and the hard palate. For valid results th
e patient must position the tongue and soft palate so that bath the orophar
ynx and nasopharynx remain open. A high rate of failure of conventional PRM
has been reported in normal individuals. In patients with obstructive slee
p apnoea syndrome (OSAS), upper airway abnormalities may further increase t
he failure rate.
This study proposes a modification of the technique in which protrusion of
the tongue enhances pressure transmission between the nasopharynx and the m
outh.
In eight normal subjects, resistance was similar when measured by both meth
ods. Of 24 OSAS patients, conventional PRM was unsuccessful in 11. In the r
emaining 13 patients, a significant correlation between the two methods was
found, but resistance was lower by "tongue-out" than by conventional PRM,
consistent with a decrease, during tongue protrusion, in retropalatal resis
tance, which is a component of the "nasal" resistance measured by PRM. In 2
6 OSAS patients, unilateral nasal resistance values measured by "tongue-out
" PRM were similar to those measured by anterior rhinomanometry. When the "
tongue-out" method was used routinely in 541 snorers, failure rates were 1.
1% in the 272 non-OSAS patients and 3.7% in the 269 OSAS patients.
These results indicate that posterior rhinomanometry with tongue protrusion
is a highly effective tool for measuring nasal resistance in snorers.