We describe a biphasic action of nitric oxide (NO) in its effects on oxidat
ive killing of isolated cells: low concentrations protect against oxidative
killing, while higher doses enhance killing, and these two effects occur b
y distinct mechanisms. While low doses of NO (from (Z)-1-[N-(3-ammonio prop
yl)-N-(n-propyl)-amino]-diazen-1-ium-1,2(2) diolate [PAPA/NO] or S-nitroso-
N-acetyl-L-penicillamine [SNAP] prevent killing of rat hepatocytes by t-but
ylhydroperoxide (tBH), further increasing doses result in increased killing
. Similar effects occur with rat hepatoma cells treated with PAPA/NO and tB
H or H2O2. Increased killing with higher concentrations of NO donor is due
to both NO and tBH, because NO donor alone is without effect. Glutathione (
GSH) is not involved in either of these actions. Based on measurements of t
hiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and effects of lipid radical
scavenger (DPPD) and deferoxamine, the protective effect, but not the enha
ncing effect, involves peroxidative chemistry. Fructose has no effect on tB
H killing alone but provides substantial protection against killing by high
er concentrations of NO plus tBH, suggesting that the enhancing effect invo
lves mitochondrial dysfunction. Hepatocytes, when stimulated to produce NO
endogenously, become resistant to tBH killing, indicative of the presence o
f an NO-triggered antioxidant defensive mechanism. The finding that the pro
tective effects of low concentrations of NO and the harmful effects of high
concentrations of NO are fundamentally different in nature suggest that th
erapeutic interventions could be designed, which selectively prevent its pr
o-oxidant activity at high concentrations, thus converting NO from a "Janus
-faced" modulator of oxidant injury into a "pure" protectant. (C) 1999 Else
vier Science Inc.