D. Prentice et J. Moreland, A comparison of infrared ear thermometry with electronic predictive thermometry in a geriatric setting, GERIAT NURS, 20(6), 1999, pp. 314-317
This project had three purposes to determine the test/retest reliability of
three thermometers-an infrared ear thermometer, an oral electronic predict
ive thermometer, and an oral mercury-in-glass thermometer (MIGT); determine
the validity (accuracy) of the first two thermometers using the MIGT as th
e gold standard; and calculate the thermometers' sensitivity and specificit
y for detecting fever using 37.5 degrees C on the MIGT as the criterion. Th
e MIGT had the best reliability, followed by the electronic predictive and
infrared ear thermometer (for validity, the former was more accurate than t
he latter). Little difference existed in the latter two thermometers' sensi
tivity and specificity. However, the confidence intervals were wide and fur
ther studies with larger samples need to be done to elucidate the thermomet
ers diagnostic properties.