Indispensability and indefensibility? The United States in the climate treaty negotiations

Citation
S. Agrawala et S. Andresen, Indispensability and indefensibility? The United States in the climate treaty negotiations, GLOB GOV, 5(4), 1999, pp. 457-482
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
ISSN journal
10752846 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
457 - 482
Database
ISI
SICI code
1075-2846(199910/12)5:4<457:IAITUS>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The United States has a penchant these days for joining international negot iations that spin out of control. We went to Kyoto to talk about climate ch ange and discovered we couldn't sign the treaty. We went to Ottawa to talk about landmines and found our military problems ignored by other states. We may be the "indispensable country," as Secretary of State Madeleine Albrig ht likes to say. But we often set ourselves up as Alamo holdouts, criticize d as the indispensable country with indefensible positions.