I. Sane et al., Efficiency of conventional sampling methods for determining arthropod densities in close-row soybeans, J AGR URB E, 16(1), 1999, pp. 65-84
Relative efficiencies of sweep-net, vertical beat sheet, and ground cloth s
ampling methods for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] arthopods were evalu
ated by relative net precision criteria in close-row (drilled) soybeans and
in conventionally planted soybeans. Accuracy and precision were determined
by fidelity of relative sample means to arthropod means from an absolute m
ethod. Fidelity to absolute population density was high in both drilled and
conventional soybeans for all relative methods except the sweep-net for so
ybean loopers, Pseudoplusia includens (Walker). The ground cloth method pro
vided the highest degree of accuracy in both field types, but the sweep-net
showed a comparable degree of fidelity for common pests in drilled fields.
Precision of sampling methods in drilled soybeans, determined by direct co
mparisons of relative variation of samples for each of the sampling techniq
ues, was best for the sweep-net for pentatomids and velvetbean caterpillar,
Anticarsia gemmatalis Hubner. The ground cloth yielded lower relative vari
ations than other methods for lepidopterous larvae in conventional soybeans
. For all arthropod species in drilled soybeans, exclusive of soybean loope
rs in both years, the sweep-net method resulted in a, higher relative effic
iency (higher relative precision per unit of cost) than the ground cloth an
d vertical beat sheet because the cost was low in work-hours required to ob
tain a satisfactory level of accuracy and precision.