R. Van Ree et al., Purified natural and recombinant Fel d 1 and cat albumin in in vitro diagnostics for cat allergy, J ALLERG CL, 104(6), 1999, pp. 1223-1230
Background: Current diagnostics and therapeutics for cat allergy are based
on cat epithelial extracts originating from highly variable source material
s, This gives rise to several problems: variability of allergen composition
, contamination with house dust mite allergens, and potential transfer of p
athogenic agents.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of repl
acing cat epithelial extracts with purified natural or recombinant allergen
s.
Methods: Sera (n = 509) were selected on the basis of a positive cat RAST r
esult and tested in a RAST for IgE reactivity to purified Fel d 1, cat albu
min (CA), or both. The analysis was performed with both natural and recombi
nant allergens, In addition, some sera were further analyzed by means of im
munoblotting, A serum pool was used for cat RAST inhibition with purified n
atural and recombinant allergens as inhibitors.
Results: Natural and recombinant Fel d 1 caused very similar results: 94.1%
and 96.1% positive test results, respectively. In general, the negative se
ra were low responders to cat extract. The addition of CA (16.7% positive s
era) resulted in a decrease in the number of discrepencies between purified
allergens and whole extract to 2.8%. Only for 2% of all sera, sensitizatio
n to cat was largely explained by IgE reactivity to CA. IgE reactivity to F
el d 1 accounts for 886 of the total IgE response to cat allergens, as was
demonstrated by RAST, with Fel d 1 concentrations nearing saturation, Recom
binant Fel d 1 performed equally well in the RAST analysis. Recombinant CA
was succesfully expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris, and its immune reac
tivity closely resembled that of its natural counterpart.
Conclusion: Natural and recombinant Fel d 1 and CA are good candidates for
replacing ill-defined cat dander extracts in diagnostics for cat allergy, A
lthough CA is not essential for the vast majority of cat-sensitized patient
s, some subjects are selectively sensitized to this serum protein.