Background: The major allergen of birch pollen, Bet v 1, is present in stru
cturally slightly different isoforms, It has been postulated that certain i
soforms show a distinct ability to bind birch pollen-specific IgE, although
the T-cell response remains similar.
Objective: We verified the hypothesis of a distinct allergenicity but simil
ar T-cell immunogenicity of 2 isoforms in birch pollen-allergic subjects by
in vivo tests and an in vitro assay for T-cell stimulation.
Methods: Forty-eight birch pollen-allergic, 11 grass pollen-allergic, and 1
0 nonatopic control individuals n ere tested with 10-fold increasing concen
trations (0.01 to 10.0 mu g/mL) of recombinant (r) Bet v la and rBet v Id b
y skin prick test (SPT), intradermal test (IDT), and conjunctival provocati
on test (CPT), An allergen-specific proliferation assay was performed on 21
patients with the 2 recombinant and the natural birch pollen allergens.
Results: In each test system only birch pollen-allergic subjects but no con
trols reacted to the recombinant allergens. A positive in vivo response to
10 mu g/mL of rBet v la was observed in 21 of 48 by SPT, in 48 of 38 by IDT
, and in 33 of 48 by CPT. In contrast, the IDT response to 10 mu g/mL of rB
et v Id was reduced by a factor of 100 because it was equivalent to the res
ponse to 0.1 mu g/mL of rBet v la, rBet v Id failed to elicit a positive re
action in SPT and CPT The proliferative response of T cells was similar for
both recombinant isoforms because 8 of 21 individuals reacted to rBet v Ia
and 6 of 21 to rBet v Id. Only I subject had a positive reaction to rBet v
Id alone.
Conclusion: The natural isoforms rBet v la and rBet v Id differ in their ab
ility to bind IgE but are similar in their immunogenicity for T cells. Thus
rBet v Id might be a promising candidate for use in immunotherapy of birch
pollen-allergic individuals.