Jm. Entenza et al., Efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by viridans group streptococci, J ANTIMICRO, 44(6), 1999, pp. 775-786
Levofloxacin was investigated against viridans group streptococci in vitro
and in rats with experimental aortic endocarditis. The MIC(90)s of levoflox
acin and ciprofloxacin for 20 independent isolates of such bacteria were 1
and 8 mg/L, respectively. Rats were infected with two types of organism: ei
ther fully susceptible to levofloxacin (MIC less than or equal to 0.5 mg/L)
or borderline susceptible (MIC 1-2 mg/L). Fully levofloxacin-susceptible b
acteria comprised one penicillin-susceptible (MIC 0.004 mg/L) Streptococcus
gordonii, and one penicillin-tolerant as well as one intermediate penicill
in-resistant (MIC 0.125 mg/L) isogenic strains. Borderline levofloxacin-sus
ceptible bacteria comprised one penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus sangui
s and one highly penicillin-resistant Streptococcus mitis (MIC 2 mg/L). Rat
s were treated for 5 days with drug dosages simulating the following treatm
ents in humans: (i) levofloxacin 500 mg orally once a day (q24 h), (ii) lev
ofloxacin 500 mg orally twice a day (q12 h), (iii) levofloxacin 1 g orally
q24 h, (iv) ciprofloxacin 750 mg orally q12 h, and (v) ceftriaxone 2 g iv q
24 h. Levofloxacin was equivalent or superior to ceftriaxone, and was succe
ssful in treating experimental endocarditis irrespective of penicillin resi
stance. Nevertheless, standard levofloxacin treatment equivalent to 500 mg
q24 h in human was less effective than twice daily 500 mg or once daily 1 g
doses against borderline-susceptible organisms. Ciprofloxacin, used as a n
egative control, was ineffective and selected for resistant isolates. This
underlines the importance of MIC determinations when treating severe strept
ococcal infection with quinolones. In the case of borderline-susceptible pa
thogens, total daily doses of 1 g of levofloxacin should be considered.