Jm. Duck et al., Social identity and perceptions of media persuasion: Are we always less influenced than others?, J APPL SO P, 29(9), 1999, pp. 1879-1899
People typically perceive negative media content (e.g., violence) to have m
ore impact on others than on themselves (a third-person effect). To examine
the perceived effects of positive content (e.g., public-service advertisem
ents) and the moderating role of social identities, we examined students' p
erceptions of the impact of AIDS advertisements on self, students (in- grou
p), nonstudents (out-group), and people in general. Perceived self-other di
fferences varied with the salience of student identity. Low identifiers dis
played the typical third-person effect, whereas high identifiers were more
willing to acknowledge impact on themselves and the student in-group. Furth
er, when influence was normatively accept able within the in-group, high id
entifiers perceived self and students (us) as more influenced than nonstude
nts (them). The theoretical and practical implications of this reversal in
third-person perceptions are discussed.