Jg. Van Der Stroom et al., Intracoronary-administered urapidil does not influence myocardial contractility, metabolic activity, or coronary sinus blood flow in humans, J CARDIOTHO, 13(6), 1999, pp. 684-689
Objective: To compare the acute effect of intracoronary administration of u
rapidil and saline on myocardial contractility and metabolic activity.
Design: Prospective, controlled, open-label study.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Participants and Interventions: Eight patients with stable coronary artery
disease (CAD) undergoing elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angiop
lasty (PTCA) received normal saline followed by urapidil, 4 mg, injected di
rectly into the left main coronary artery
Measurements and Main Results: Because local intracoronary administration i
s a non-steady-state condition, an in vitro model was used before the clini
cal experiments to establish the kinetic effects of acute administration of
urapidil. The clinical experiments were performed in eight patients with C
AD after PTCA. Measurements included a complete hemodynamic profile, corona
ry sinus blood flow (continuous thermodilution), left ventricular (LV) peak
(+) dP/dt, LV peak(-) dP/dt, LV dP/dt/P(D)40, and LV end-diastolic pressur
es. Arterial and coronary venous blood samples were also obtained for the c
alculation of myocardial oxygen consumption. Baseline measurements I were f
irst obtained, followed by intracoronary injection of 2 mt of saline. Addit
ional measurements were obtained 1, 5, and 10 minutes after administration
of saline. After a resting period (15 minutes), baseline measurements II, a
nd intracoronary injection of urapidil, 4 mg (dissolved in 2 mi saline), ad
ditional measurements were obtained 1. 5, and 10 minutes later. Heart rate
decreased 2.7 +/- 3.5 beats/min after injection of saline, whereas heart ra
te increased 2.0 +/- 1.8 beats/min after inrtracoronary urapidil, resulting
in a significant difference in treatment effect (p = 0.003). There were no
additional differences in treatment effect for any of the other measured o
r calculated parameters reflecting systemic hemodynamics, LV contractility,
coronary dynamics, and myocardial metabolic activity.
Conclusion: The results suggest that intracoronary bolus administration of
preservative-free urapidil, 4 mg, is not associated with any detectable eff
ect on myocardial contractility or coronary smooth muscle in awake nonsurgi
cal patients with CAD, after PTCA. Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunders Comp
any.