It has been proposed (Trinkaus, 1983a; Miller & Gross, 1998) that the marke
d thickness of Neandertal patellae and/or the posterior displacement of the
ir tibial condyles increased their relative M quadriceps femoris moment arm
s, thereby making their legs powerful in extension. However, it is necessar
y to compare these reflections of muscle moment arm length to appropriate m
easures of the body weight moment arm and body mass estimates, both of whic
h are influenced by ecogeographically determined body proportions. Reassess
ment of tibial condylar displacement and patellar thickness, as well as pat
ellar height, relative to an appropriate measure of the moment arm for the
baseline load on the knee (body weight), to that moment arm times estimated
body mass, and to that moment arm times a skeletal reflection of body mass
(femoral head diameter) rejects the hypothesis that the Neandertals had ex
ceptionally powerful knee extension. Relative tibial condylar displacement
remains above that of a modem industrial society sample, but similar to tha
t of the Broken Hill tibia, Late Pleistocene early modern humans and a rece
nt human nonindustrial sample. Relative patellar thickness is similar to th
at of early modern humans, who have relatively thick patellae compared to t
he late Holocene human samples. Consequently, once body proportions are tak
en into account, there is little difference between the Neandertals and oth
er later Pleistocene humans in knee extensor mechanical advantage, and all
of these fossil hominids are similar in the more important proximal tibial
proportions to those of nonindustrial recent humans. (C) 1999 Academic Pres
s.