Wj. Crumb, Loratadine blockade of K+ channels in human heart: Comparison with terfenadine under physiological conditions, J PHARM EXP, 292(1), 2000, pp. 261-264
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Recently, there has been considerable attention focused on drugs that prolo
ng the QT interval of the electrocardiogram, with the H-1-receptor antagoni
st class of drugs figuring prominently. Albeit rare, incidences of QT prolo
ngation and ventricular arrhythmias, in particular torsade de pointes, have
been reported with the antihistamines astemizole and terfenadine and more
recently with loratadine. The most likely mechanism for these drug-related
arrhythmias is blockage of one or more ion channels involved in cardiac rep
olarization. Several studies have demonstrated block of multiple cardiac K channels by terfenadine, including I-to, I-sus, I-K1, and I-Kr or human et
her-a-go-go-related gene (HERG). In contrast to terfenadine, previous studi
es have shown the antihistamine loratadine to be virtually free of cardiac
ion channel-blocking effects. This disparity in the lack of any significant
cardiac ion channel-blocking effect and the existence of numerous adverse
cardiac event reports for loratadine prompted the comparison of the human c
ardiac K+ channel-blocking profile for loratadine and terfenadine under phy
siological conditions [37 degrees C, holding potential (V-hold) = -75 mV] w
ith the whole-cell patch-clamp method. Isolated human atrial myocytes were
used to examine drug effects on I-to, I-sus, and I-K1, whereas HERG was stu
died in stably transfected HEK cells. In contrast to previous studies in no
nhuman systems and/or under nonphysiological conditions, terfenadine (1 mu
M) had no effect on I-to, I-sus,or I-K1 at pacing rates up to 3 Hz. Similar
results were found for 1 mM loratadine. However, both drugs potently block
ed HERG current amplitude, with a mean IC50 of 173 nM for loratadine and 20
4 nM for terfenadine (pacing rate, 0.1 Hz). Neither drug exhibited any sign
ificant use-dependent blockage of HERG (pacing rates = 0.1- 3 Hz). These re
sults point to a similarity in the human cardiac K+ channel-blocking effect
s of loratadine and terfenadine and provide a possible mechanism for the ar
rhythmias associated with the use of either drug.