Pharmacokinetic differences between chlorofluorocarbon and chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhalers of beclomethasone dipropionate in adult asthmatics
Li. Harrison et al., Pharmacokinetic differences between chlorofluorocarbon and chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhalers of beclomethasone dipropionate in adult asthmatics, J PHARM PHA, 51(11), 1999, pp. 1235-1240
We have compared the serum pharmacokinetics of the metabolites of beclometh
asone dipropionate after inhalation from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydro
fluoroalkane HFA-134a (HFA) formulations in asthmatic patients.
Twenty-three patients completed this open-label, randomized, single-dose, t
hree-period crossover study. Each patient received in separate periods 200
mu g or 400 mu g HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate, or 400 mu g CFC-beclometh
asone dipropionate. Venous blood samples were collected over 24 h for the d
etermination of beclomethasone esters and beclomethasone in the serum.
Significant differences in pharmacokinetics following HFA- and CFC-beclomet
hasone dipropionate were observed. Following a 400 mu g beclomethasone dipr
opionate dose, the HFA formulation gave mean maximum concentrations (C-max)
and area under the curve (AUC) values of beclomethasone esters of 1153 pg
mL(-1) and 4328 pg h mL(-1), respectively, and beclomethasone C-max and AUC
values of 69 pg mL(-1) and 682 pg h mL(-1) respectively. These values were
approximately 2-3-fold those seen with the CFC formulation (beclomethasone
eaters C-max and AUC of 380 pg mL(-1) and 1764 pg h mL(-1), respectively;
beclomethasone C-max and AUC of 41 pg mL(-1) and 366 pg h mL(-1) respective
ly). Beclomethasone esters, the major component of beclomethasone dipropion
ate in the serum, peaked significantly earlier for the HFA formulation (0 .
8 h) than for the CFC formulation (2 h). Tests for dose proportionality of
beclomethasone esters pharmacokinetics following HFA-beclomethasone diprop
ionate showed that the two hydrofluoroalkane strengths were proportional.
The more rapid and greater efficiency of systemic drug delivery of the HFA
formulation compared with the CFC formulation can be explained if most of e
ach inhalation from CFC-beclomethasone dipropionate is swallowed and absorb
ed orally, whereas most of each inhalation from HFA-beclomethasone dipropio
nate is absorbed through the lungs. There is a need for comprehensive dose-
response efficacy trials, with the use of the steep portion of the dose-res
ponse relationship, to evaluate the significance of these pharmacokinetic d
ifferences.