The technical difficulties associated with building and solving applied gen
eral equilibrium (GE) models seem to have distracted our attention from the
data. Ln this article, we forcefully stress that whatever the sophisticati
on of the GE analysis, it is only worth the quality of the supporting data
it utilizes. We first highlight an example of a flagrant flaw in officially
published input-output data (factor-income shares) by an LDC (Turkey), whi
ch many researchers use without question. We then make use of an applied GE
model to evaluate the dynamic gains for Turkey from currently debated trad
e policy options and compare the predictions using conservatively adjusted,
rather than official, data on factor shares. We show that the predicted we
lfare gains are not only of a different order of magnitude, but in some cas
es, of a different sign, hence, suggesting contradictory policy recommendat
ions. (C) 1999 Society for Policy Modeling. Published by Elsevier Science I
nc.