Influence of sacral neuromodulation on electrosensation of the lower urinary tract

Citation
Jj. Wyndaele et al., Influence of sacral neuromodulation on electrosensation of the lower urinary tract, J UROL, 163(1), 2000, pp. 221-224
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00225347 → ACNP
Volume
163
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
221 - 224
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(200001)163:1<221:IOSNOE>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Purpose: We prospectively investigated whether neuromodulation of the S3 ro ot influences the sensory threshold to electrical stimulation in the lower urinary tract. Materials and Methods: The study included 7 women and 3 men receiving S3 ne uromodulation at 210 msec. and 25 Hz. with the Interstim PNE* system for a mean of 5 days. Neuromodulation was done unilaterally in 6 cases and bilate rally in 4, The sensory threshold was determined by electrodes placed rando mly against the mucosa of the empty bladder on the left and right sides, in the urethra in women, and in the prostatic and penile urethra in men. Thre sholds were measured at each location with neuromodulation on and off. Results: With bilateral neuromodulation on all 4 patients had a lower bladd er threshold than with neuromodulation off. In unilateral neuromodulation t he threshold was significantly lower duping neurostimulation on the ipsilat eral side. There was no effect on the threshold on the arm or in the urethr a. The effect was noted in patients in whom neuromodulation was and was not clinically successful. Conclusions: Neuromodulation on S3 influences the nervous system involved i n electrosensation of the bladder but not the skin afferent innervation or the nerves involved in urethral electrosensation. These data support the hy pothesis that S3 neurostimulation is effective mainly through the afferent nervous system in the pelvic nerves.