PURPOSE: This retrospective study was performed to investigate the authors'
clinical observations that suggest that Tesio hemodialysis catheters may i
nitially have suboptimal blood flow rates, which improve spontaneously afte
r several hemodialysis treatment sessions,
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty Tesio twin hemodialysis catheters were placed
in 49 patients during a a-year period. Thirty twin catheters were placed by
radiologists, and 30 were placed by surgeons. The catheter blood flow rate
s and catheter line pressures, which were recorded during each of the first
five hemodialysis treatment sessions, were reviewed and analyzed to determ
ine the performance of each catheter during the first five hemodialysis tre
atments. In addition, the authors compared the site of catheter placement a
nd responsible service (surgery or radiology) using this catheter performan
ce data.
RESULTS: Twenty-six catheters (43%) provided adequate blood flow (250 mL/mi
n) throughout the first five hemodialysis sessions. Twenty-six catheters (4
3%) had inadequate or variable blood flow rates, some of which improved wit
hout intervention, Eight catheters (13%) required an intervention before th
e first five hemodialysis sessions had been completed. Right-sided catheter
s performed better than left-sided catheters, There was no difference in pe
rformance between catheters placed by surgeons and those placed by radiolog
ists.
CONCLUSION: This investigation supports the authors' suspicion that some Te
sio catheters may have inadequate initial performance but the blood flows c
an improve, without intervention, during the first five hemodialysis sessio
ns/2 weeks of use.